<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enjambement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geotypografika.com/2009/02/24/enjambement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geotypografika.com/2009/02/24/enjambement/</link>
	<description>Visual Communication und Wissenschaft</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ryan hageman</title>
		<link>http://geotypografika.com/2009/02/24/enjambement/comment-page-1/#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan hageman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geotypografika.com/?p=9842#comment-9098</guid>
		<description>it is a new perspective for designers. what's more important, justification, structured grids, common baselines, or the expression of the content? it sounds like something david carson would say, yet i feel this is somehow different than what's taken place in the recent past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a new perspective for designers. what&#8217;s more important, justification, structured grids, common baselines, or the expression of the content? it sounds like something david carson would say, yet i feel this is somehow different than what&#8217;s taken place in the recent past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
